5 thoughts on “Women accidentally lost the 260,000 diamond ring. What did the head of hot pot restaurants express this?”
Bradley
The person in charge of the hotpot restaurant said that the loss of the hot pot restaurant of Ms. Xu's ring has some responsibility. The hot pot restaurant will compensate a certain amount of compensation by consumer vouchers, but Ms. Xu believes that the loss of the ring should be the responsibility of the store. Therefore, when the opinions are left, the two parties can only protect their rights through legal channels. . Eating hot pot in Haidilao, the ring was lost according to the description of Ms. Xu Xu in Ningbo, indicating that when she went to Haidilao with her husband and friend to eat hot pot, because she made a nail first, she directly took the ring to the ring directly. Put it in a transparent bag and put the bag directly on the table during the hot pot. When the waiter cleaned the garbage, he directly threw the ring as a garbage. After Ms. Xu also returned home, she found out that the ring was missing, so she hurried to the hot pot restaurant to find, and finally learned that the ring was thrown away by the waiter through the monitoring. However, Ms. Xu disagrees about the behavior of the ring being thrown away. In Ms. Xu's view, the ring was taken away by the waiter. The waiters said that when the desktop was cleaned at that time, it was because the chopsticks on the table were dirty, so they cleaned it up. At present, the police are still investigating. If the waiter really takes it away, it is theft, and it must be legal. Anyway, wait for the results of the police. . For Ms. Xu, because of the more than 200,000 diamond rings on the table to eat hot pot at that time, because the waiter's cleanup, Cai will cause Ms. Xu's diamond ring to be lost. And after Ms. Xu returned home, she found that according to the waiter, she was thrown directly into the trash. but when the waiter was looking for in the trash can, the diamond ring was not found. For Ms. Xu, if the diamond ring is lost, the loss must be great. And the waiter's behavior is also suspicious. At present, the police are also investigating. If it is really a waiter, it will take legal responsibility. It just hope that Ms. Xu can find the diamond ring as soon as possible, and the waiters of Haidilao will also take a certain responsibility. After all, the diamond ring is placed in a transparent bag. If anyone sees it, it will think that it is a diamond ring that cannot be thrown away as a garbage. Therefore, I disagree with the statement of Haidilao. . The person in charge of Haidilao is also pushing off the responsibility. Even if it is garbage, then the guest's opinion is required to ask if the guest is garbage, instead of throwing it away unilaterally. The person in charge of Haidilao also said that it would solve this matter through legal channels. Ms. Xu waited for the police to investigate how to protect their rights.
The person in charge of the hotpot restaurant believes that they have a certain responsibility, but the main responsibility is still women. They will compensate for compensation by consumer vouchers, but the key to I think is whether this ring is lost by the waiter or the waiter took away it. It's right.
The person in charge of the hot pot restaurant said that Ms. Xu's 260,000 ring was lost. The incident had some responsibility in the hot pot restaurant, so she would make certain compensation for Ms. Xu in the form of consumer vouchers.
The person in charge of the hotpot restaurant said that the loss of the hot pot restaurant of Ms. Xu's ring has some responsibility. The hot pot restaurant will compensate a certain amount of compensation by consumer vouchers, but Ms. Xu believes that the loss of the ring should be the responsibility of the store. Therefore, when the opinions are left, the two parties can only protect their rights through legal channels.
The person in charge of the hotpot restaurant said that the loss of the hot pot restaurant of Ms. Xu's ring has some responsibility. The hot pot restaurant will compensate a certain amount of compensation by consumer vouchers, but Ms. Xu believes that the loss of the ring should be the responsibility of the store. Therefore, when the opinions are left, the two parties can only protect their rights through legal channels.
. Eating hot pot in Haidilao, the ring was lost according to the description of Ms. Xu Xu in Ningbo, indicating that when she went to Haidilao with her husband and friend to eat hot pot, because she made a nail first, she directly took the ring to the ring directly. Put it in a transparent bag and put the bag directly on the table during the hot pot.
When the waiter cleaned the garbage, he directly threw the ring as a garbage. After Ms. Xu also returned home, she found out that the ring was missing, so she hurried to the hot pot restaurant to find, and finally learned that the ring was thrown away by the waiter through the monitoring. However, Ms. Xu disagrees about the behavior of the ring being thrown away. In Ms. Xu's view, the ring was taken away by the waiter.
The waiters said that when the desktop was cleaned at that time, it was because the chopsticks on the table were dirty, so they cleaned it up. At present, the police are still investigating. If the waiter really takes it away, it is theft, and it must be legal. Anyway, wait for the results of the police.
. For Ms. Xu, because of the more than 200,000 diamond rings on the table to eat hot pot at that time, because the waiter's cleanup, Cai will cause Ms. Xu's diamond ring to be lost. And after Ms. Xu returned home, she found that according to the waiter, she was thrown directly into the trash.
but when the waiter was looking for in the trash can, the diamond ring was not found. For Ms. Xu, if the diamond ring is lost, the loss must be great. And the waiter's behavior is also suspicious. At present, the police are also investigating. If it is really a waiter, it will take legal responsibility.
It just hope that Ms. Xu can find the diamond ring as soon as possible, and the waiters of Haidilao will also take a certain responsibility. After all, the diamond ring is placed in a transparent bag. If anyone sees it, it will think that it is a diamond ring that cannot be thrown away as a garbage. Therefore, I disagree with the statement of Haidilao.
. The person in charge of Haidilao is also pushing off the responsibility. Even if it is garbage, then the guest's opinion is required to ask if the guest is garbage, instead of throwing it away unilaterally. The person in charge of Haidilao also said that it would solve this matter through legal channels. Ms. Xu waited for the police to investigate how to protect their rights.
The person in charge of the hotpot restaurant believes that they have a certain responsibility, but the main responsibility is still women. They will compensate for compensation by consumer vouchers, but the key to I think is whether this ring is lost by the waiter or the waiter took away it. It's right.
The person in charge of the hot pot restaurant said that Ms. Xu's 260,000 ring was lost. The incident had some responsibility in the hot pot restaurant, so she would make certain compensation for Ms. Xu in the form of consumer vouchers.
Their managers said they would find out the truth as soon as possible, and give customers an explanation so that customers should not worry.
The person in charge of the hotpot restaurant said that the loss of the hot pot restaurant of Ms. Xu's ring has some responsibility. The hot pot restaurant will compensate a certain amount of compensation by consumer vouchers, but Ms. Xu believes that the loss of the ring should be the responsibility of the store. Therefore, when the opinions are left, the two parties can only protect their rights through legal channels.